350
6.0

关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过

导演:
居伊·德波
主演:
未知
别名:
未知
6.0
350人评分
法语
语言
未知
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:

  Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
  These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
  Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."�
  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.
  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.
  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

猜你喜欢
换一换
绿色边境
993
3.0
HD
绿色边境
3.0
更新时间:2023年12月10日
主演:Jalal Altawil,玛雅·奥丝塔泽斯卡,托马斯·洛索,贝希·贾纳蒂·阿泰,Mohamed Al Rashi,Dalia Naous,Malwina Buss,Monika Frajczyk,皮奥塔·斯特拉莫夫斯基,娅希米娜·波拉克,玛尔塔·斯塔米尔斯卡,阿伽塔·库莱沙,马赛杰·斯图尔,马格达莱纳·珀拉斯佳,Jan Aleksandrowicz,安娜·比尔纳西克,姆本杜·乔利,罗曼·斯勾勒斯基,Milan Steindler,Nadim Suleiman
简介:

  波蘭與白俄羅斯交界上的這片蓊鬱森林,大批中東與非洲難民湧入,敘利亞難民一家也在其中。他們以為只要步行通過邊界,進入歐洲,安全的日子就會到來。殊不知波蘭政府放任邊境警察用暴力驅趕難民,白俄軍方會再將他們逐回原地。成為白俄羅斯擾亂歐盟的人肉子彈,又被波蘭政府視為洪水猛獸,全家老小困在林中進退不得、飢寒交迫,陷入無間往復的煉獄。
  波蘭名導阿格涅斯卡霍蘭年逾七十,火力與行動力絲毫未減,把2021年真實事件搬上大銀幕。除了以匿名警衛證詞為本,更用史詩級篇幅,從邊境警察、救援人士、鄰近居民等不同視角,堆疊出的殘酷真相,凝成一記人心重擊。直指當局利用民眾仇外心理,罔顧難民人權,甚至加入最新國際事件比對,觀點犀利、力道強大,引來波蘭警政激烈反彈。影片於威尼斯影展首映後,不僅好評橫掃國際,更獲頒評審團特別獎。

1662
2023
绿色边境
主演:Jalal Altawil,玛雅·奥丝塔泽斯卡,托马斯·洛索,贝希·贾纳蒂·阿泰,Mohamed Al Rashi,Dalia Naous,Malwina Buss,Monika Frajczyk,皮奥塔·斯特拉莫夫斯基,娅希米娜·波拉克,玛尔塔·斯塔米尔斯卡,阿伽塔·库莱沙,马赛杰·斯图尔,马格达莱纳·珀拉斯佳,Jan Aleksandrowicz,安娜·比尔纳西克,姆本杜·乔利,罗曼·斯勾勒斯基,Milan Steindler,Nadim Suleiman
局外人2016
354
1.0
HD
局外人2016
1.0
更新时间:2023年10月10日
主演:亚瑟·杜彭,弗朗索瓦-格扎维埃·德梅松,萨巴纳·奥扎尼,陶菲克·杰拉巴,托马斯·库芒,索伦·普雷沃斯特,弗兰兹-鲁道夫·郎,吕克·席尔茨,穆罕默德·阿列兹基,安布鲁瓦兹·米歇尔,本杰明·莱蒙,斯特凡·巴克,马斯·贝尔西托,罗宾·希纳西
简介:

  《放牛班的春天》法国导演克里斯托夫·巴拉蒂执导,凯萨奖男星亚瑟·杜彭主演。
  电影改编自真实事件,九年前震惊全球的「500亿欧元交易弊案」,描述2008年时,31岁的巴黎交易员杰宏柯维耶在未经授权下进行金融买卖,涉及的投资金额高达500亿欧元,几乎导致法国兴业银行(Société Générale)倒闭,更引发全球金融大暴泻。这位人称「魔鬼交易员」的柯维耶,如何偷天换日、秘密进行500亿欧元的交易?由于金额太过庞大,让人怀疑内情不单纯,不仅国际议论纷纷,更成为金融机构的职训教材。
  拜该案知名度之赐,《巴黎交易员》各国版权狂卖,不仅电影获伊斯坦堡金桔奖提名最佳影片,导演巴拉蒂更获好莱坞报导讚誉「挖掘出事件的娱乐性」。
  剧情讲述,杰宏来自布列塔尼,他幸运挤身法兴银行,在获主管同侪欣赏下,摇身成为巴黎交易员。人生鲤跃龙门,眼界自此大开,而他在股价期货交易赚到的钱,更远超过父亲几十个劳碌的人生。
  杰宏的父亲是个锅炉工人,母亲则是理髮师。顶著金融硕士头衔的他,彷彿有弹指魔法,总能帮银行赚进惊人利润,却也逐渐沉迷于一场场的金钱游戏。杰宏每投必中宛若神助,在银行默许下,他越发大胆展开最疯狂交易,不仅买卖金额逐步超越权限,投资金额更超乎银行股本,导致不可收拾局面,引发那斯达克、道琼欧盟指数崩盘暴泻,银行跟著摇摇欲坠。
  银行愤怒对杰宏提出控告,使他面临49亿欧元的天价求偿!这位「魔鬼交易员」如何能瞒天过海、暗地进行500亿欧元的投资?他坚持没有私吞一毛钱,但凭空消失的钜款,究竟去了哪裡?一场关乎人性与欲望的金钱游戏于是登场。

972
2016
局外人2016
主演:亚瑟·杜彭,弗朗索瓦-格扎维埃·德梅松,萨巴纳·奥扎尼,陶菲克·杰拉巴,托马斯·库芒,索伦·普雷沃斯特,弗兰兹-鲁道夫·郎,吕克·席尔茨,穆罕默德·阿列兹基,安布鲁瓦兹·米歇尔,本杰明·莱蒙,斯特凡·巴克,马斯·贝尔西托,罗宾·希纳西
暗夜哭声
797
1.0
HD中字
暗夜哭声
1.0
更新时间:2025年02月24日
主演:梅丽尔·斯特里普,山姆·尼尔,戴尔·里夫斯,大卫·霍夫林,杰森·瑞生,迈克尔·韦特尔,多萝西·艾莉森,Maurie Fields,彼得·霍斯金,查尔斯‘巴德’汀格维尔,Bruce Myles,丹尼斯·米勒,刘易斯·菲茨-杰拉德,Sandy Gore,雷格·埃文斯,卢西亚诺·卡蒂纳齐,Jim Holt,约翰·霍华德,Frankie J. Holden,Bill Garner,黛博拉-李·福奈丝,Chuck Faulkner,Pat Thomson,James Higgins,詹姆斯·康顿,尼克·泰特,Mar
简介:

  故事发生在1980年的澳大利亚,迈克尔(山姆·尼尔 Sam Neill 饰)和妻子林迪(梅丽尔·斯特里普 Meryl Streep 饰)带着他们的三个孩子正在进行一场家庭旅行。某天夜里,夫妻两人将最小的孩子阿扎利亚留在襁褓之中外出访友,哪知道一场意外的发生夺走了阿扎利亚幼小的生命。
  让迈克尔和林迪万万没有想到的是,他们除了要承受失去孩子的巨大悲痛之外,竟然还遭到了指控,指控夫妻两人正是幕后的凶手。随后,法庭开始了对于该案件的漫长的审判,尽管缺乏关键的证据,但林迪还是被判处了终身监禁。在狱中,林迪生下了第四个孩子,孩子被交由迈克尔抚养。漫长的牢狱岁月里,林迪不断的上诉,并最终为自己挣得了清白和自由。

804
1988
暗夜哭声
主演:梅丽尔·斯特里普,山姆·尼尔,戴尔·里夫斯,大卫·霍夫林,杰森·瑞生,迈克尔·韦特尔,多萝西·艾莉森,Maurie Fields,彼得·霍斯金,查尔斯‘巴德’汀格维尔,Bruce Myles,丹尼斯·米勒,刘易斯·菲茨-杰拉德,Sandy Gore,雷格·埃文斯,卢西亚诺·卡蒂纳齐,Jim Holt,约翰·霍华德,Frankie J. Holden,Bill Garner,黛博拉-李·福奈丝,Chuck Faulkner,Pat Thomson,James Higgins,詹姆斯·康顿,尼克·泰特,Mar
首页
电影
电视剧
综艺
动漫
短剧